A Simulation and Comparison of Propulsion Systems for a Manned Mission to Mars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3043Keywords:
Chemical rockets, Propulsion systems, Manned Mission to MarsAbstract
Recent developments suggest a manned mission to Mars as a realistic near future
possibility, therefore requiring additional consideration into which propulsion system to use.
Examples include the traditional chemical rocket; the nuclear pulse engine, which propels a
spacecraft using nuclear explosions; the ion thruster, which accelerates propellant using
electrically charged grids; and others. This paper evaluates six such propulsion systems using
Python computer simulations. Each simulation models a SpaceX Starship spacecraft modified to
use one of the six propulsion systems, calculating and returning values for transfer time and
propellant mass consumption. These results are analyzed and ranked to determine how the
different systems would compare in performance in an actual mission, specifically in the
aforementioned criteria of travel time and propellant expenditure.
References
W. Sheehan and J. Bell, Discovering Mars: A History of Observation and Exploration of
the Red Planet. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press, 2021.
S. Creech, J. Guidi and D. Elburn, "Artemis: An Overview of NASA's Activities to Return
Humans to the Moon," 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, United
States, 2022.
J. Wilken, M. Sippel, and M. Berger, "Critical Analysis of SpaceX's Next Generation
Space Transportation System: Starship and Super Heavy", HiSST: 2nd International
Conference on High-Speed Vehicle Science Technology, 11 Sep. 2022.
H. Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. Linacre House, Jordan Hill,
Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
M. Tajmar, Advanced Space Propulsion Systems. New York, New York: Springer-Verlag
Wien, 2003.
J. L. Finseth, “Rover Nuclear Rocket Engine Program: Overview of Rover Engine Tests,”
Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Huntsville, AL, United States, Rep. 19920005899, 1991.
G. Dyson, Project Orion: The True Story of the Atomic Spaceship. New York, New York:
Henry Holt and Co, 2003.
W. A. Hollerman, “The Physics of Solar Sails,” Louisiana Univ., Lafayette, LA, United
States, Rep. 20030093608, 2003.
A. Farres, C. Webster, and D. Folta, “High Fidelity Modeling of SRP and Its Effect on the
Relative Motion of Starshade and WFIRST,” NASA, Greenbelt, MD, United States, Rep.
, 2018.
J. Kawaguchi, O. Mori, R. Funase, Y. Tsuda, H. Sawada, T. Yamamoto, T. Saiki, T. Endo,
and H. Yonekura, “Development and operation summary of world’s first solar power sail
IKAROS,” Journal of Space Technology and Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 20–38, 2013.
D. M. Goebel and I. Katz, Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion. Pasadena, CA: California
Institute of Technology, 2008.
R. M. Myers, “Applied-field MPD thruster geometry effects,” Sverdrup Technology, Inc.,
Brook Park, OH, United States, Rep. 19910017903, 1991.
K. Toki, Y. Shimizu, and K. Kuriki, “Ground tests and space tests of a
magnetoplasmadynamic arcjet thruster system,” J. Space Technol. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2,
pp. 2_27–2_40, 1997.
M. A. Mantenieks, J. S. Sovey, R. M. Myers, T. W. Haag, P. Raitano, J. E. Parkes,
“Performance of a 100 kW class applied field MPD thruster,” NASA, Cleveland, OH,
United States, Rep. 19890018330, 1989.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sevin Kwon, Cody Waldecker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.