On The effects of non-Gaussian wave packets on double slit interference patterns
A parametric comparison of Lorentzian wavepackets versus Gaussian wavepackets in double-slit experiments, using computational analysis.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3541Keywords:
Wave optics, Computational model for interference patterns, Wave phenomena, WavepacketsAbstract
Wavepackets, defined as a superposition of plane waves with finite spectral width and spatial localisation arising from Fourier structure, are essential in both relativistic and non-relativistic setups in quantum theory. Different wave packets can be made by altering the functional form of the envelope of the wave packet. For the double slit experiment, non-matter waves are usually preferred to be modelled by the Gaussian wavepacket because they allow closed-form solutions under the Fourier transformation, which simplifies the prediction of interference effects. Hence, there is an existing gap in the current literature on the effects on double slit interference patterns when non-Gaussian wavpackets, such as the Lorentzian wavepacket, are used.
The study thus examined the effects of non-Gaussian wavepackets by comparing the interference patterns by modelling the interference patterns at a screen, D distance away. The study used 'condition sets', with varied parameters in each set to model interference in different geometric setups (varying geomteric factors like slit separation, wave number, and the width of wavepackets). The interference patterns were then analysed at different 'time-frames' (considering time as a paramteric index but not physical time) to observe the evolution of the interference patterns.
The results showed stark differences; Gaussian and Lorentzian wavepackets had clear and systematic differences in how they evolve and form double-slit interference pattern. Gaussian packets transitioned from a single central maximum to two dominant peaks with time, with larger slit separations producing this transition earlier and yielding more fringes overall, whereas Lorentzian packets, with their heavy tails, evolved faster; secondary maxima became competitive earlier, fringe amplitudes persisted farther out, and an unusual three-peak structure emerged under specific low-distance conditions.
Overall, the results show that wavepacket shape strongly influences early-time interference features, while the large-scale structure is controlled primarily by slit geometry and wavelength.
References
Greenberger, Daniel M, et al. Compendium of Quantum Physics : Concepts, Experiments, History, and Philosophy. Heidelberg ; New York, Springer, 2009, pp. 828–830.
Heisenberg, Werner. "Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik." Zeitschrift für Physik 43.3 (1927): 172-198.
Fitzpatrick, Richard. Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Company, 19 May 2015.
Oda, Kin-ya, and Juntaro Wada. “Lorentz-Covariant Spinor Wave Packet.” Physical Review. D/Physical Review. D., vol. 110, no. 7, 1 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.076001. Accessed 13 Dec. 2025.
Dieks, Dennis & Nienhuis, Gerard. (1990). Relativistic aspects of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics - AMER J PHYS. 58. 650-655. 10.1119/1.16426.
Baiguera, Stefano. “Aspects of Non-Relativistic Quantum Field Theories.” Arxiv.org, 2024, arxiv.org/html/2311.00027v2. Accessed 13 Dec. 2025.
Pavšič, M. Localized States in Quantum Field Theory. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 28, 89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00006-018-0904-5
Hung-Ming Tsai and Bill Poirier 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 701 012013
Padmanabhan, T.. (2018). Obtaining the non-relativistic quantum mechanics from quantum field theory: issues, folklores and facts: What happens to the antiparticles when you take the non-relativistic limit of QFT?. The European Physical Journal C. 78. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6039-y.
Baldo, Marcello. (2025). Lorentz Transformation in Quantum Mechanics. 10.48550/arXiv.2511.11342.
Makris, Nicos, and Gary F. Dargush. “A Real-Valued Description of Quantum Mechanics with Schrödinger’s 4th-Order Matter-Wave Equation.” Physics Open, vol. 23, 14 Mar. 2025, p. 100262,www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666032625000122,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physo.2025.100262.
Fitzpatrick, Richard. “Normalization of the Wavefunction.” Farside.ph.utexas.edu, 20 July 2010, farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/qmech/Quantum/node34.html.
Read, Dr. Mark S. D. “QM Normalising a Wave Function 3 | Chemistry Outreach.” Chemreach.science, 2019, chemreach.science/qm-normalising-a-wave-function-3/.
Benyong Chen, Jianbo Luo, and Dacheng Li, "Code counting of optical fringes: methodology and realization," Appl. Opt. 44, 217-223 (2005)
Gamdan Optics. “Interferometry - Fringes and Phases.” Gamdan Optics, 3 Nov. 2021, www.gamdan.com/blog/interferometry-fringes-and-phases.
SATHEE . “SATHEE: Physics Youngs Double Slit Experiment.” Iitk.ac.in, 2025, sathee.iitk.ac.in/article/physics/physics-youngs-double-slit-experiment/.
قسم, الفيزياء, et al. المستنصرية الجامعة - العلوم كلية Lecture (3) Coherence, Thin Film and Fresnel Biprism Edited By. 2023
Albert, M, and P. Devillard. “Waiting Time Distribution for Trains of Quantized Electron Pulses.” Physical Review B, vol. 90, no. 3, 22 July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.035431.
Libretexts (Physics). “5.10: Fringe Visibility.” Physics LibreTexts, 11 Jan. 2022, phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Optics/BSc_Optics_(Konijnenberg_Adam_and_Urbach)/05%3A_Interference_and_coherence/5.10%3A_Fringe_Visibility.
OpenStax. “4.4: Double-Slit Diffraction.” Physics LibreTexts, 1 Nov. 2016, phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_(OpenStax)/University_Physics_III_-_Optics_and_Modern_Physics_(OpenStax)/04%3A_Diffraction/4.04%3A_Double-Slit_Diffraction.
Kok, Pieter, and Brendon W Lovett. Introduction to Optical Quantum Information Processing. Cambridge University Press, 22 Apr. 2010, p. 27.
Koch, Dr. Erik. “Gaussian Wave Packets.” Cond-Mat.de, 2025, www.cond-mat.de/teaching/QM/JSim/wpack.html.
Hanson, David M., et al. “3.6: Wavefunctions Must Be Normalized.” Chemistry LibreTexts, 17 June 2014, chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Physical_Chemistry_(LibreTexts)/03%3A_The_Schrodinger_Equation_and_a_Particle_in_a_Box/3.06%3A_Wavefunctions_Must_Be_Normalized.
GeeksforGeeks. “Trapezoidal Rule.” GeeksforGeeks, 21 June 2021, www.geeksforgeeks.org/maths/trapezoidal-rule/.
Božić, Mirjana & Davidović, Milena & Dimitrova, Todorka & Miret-Artés, Salvador & Sanz, Angel & Weis, Antoine. (2010). Generalized Arago-Fresnel laws: The EME-flow-line description. Journal of Russian Laser Research. 31. 117-128. 10.1007/s10946-010-9131-9.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shaarav Ayachit

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.