An Accessible, Low-Cost method for Gait Monitoring with a Raspberry Pi and MPU 6050: Proof of Concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3736Keywords:
Gait Monitoring, Low-Cost Wearable Device, Raspberry Pi 5Abstract
Gait deviations are common in aging populations and those with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders, leading to reduced independence and higher healthcare costs. Even though optical motion-capture systems deliver the accuracy necessary for kinematic analysis, the cost associated with it restricts the usage in laboratory settings. We developed a low-cost, wearable gait measuring device that can be held in the hand, utilizing a Raspberry Pi 5 and an MPU6050 IMU. The system recorded six motion features from an inertial measurement unit and compared walking trials against a user-specific baseline using a Euclidean distance metric. Unlike camera-based or smartphone-dependent systems, our proposed device operates independently of external infrastructure and is designed to support patient-specific calibration using minimal computational resources. We hypothesized that gyroscope-based motion features would be more sensitive than accelerometer features for distinguishing deviations from normal gait. The tool has the potential to enhance remote gait monitoring, rehabilitation, as well as the early detection of conditions of gait abnormalities, thus improving the quality of life for patients suffering from gait disorders. Preliminary testing using simulated gait conditions demonstrated greater variability in gyroscopic features compared to accelerometer features, with correct classification in approximately 75% of tested conditions across multiple simulated gait scenarios.
References
Castillo, B., et al. “Assessing
Spatiotemporal Behavior of Human Gait: A Comparative Study
between Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Mocap and OptiTrack Systems.” Experimental Techniques, Springer Science+Business Media, May 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00716-x.
Collins, Francis S., and Harold Varmus. “A New Initiative on Precision Medicine.” New England
Journal of Medicine, vol. 372, no. 9, Feb. 2015, pp. 793–95, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1500523.
Fuller, Daniel, et al. “Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for
Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.” JMIR MHealth and UHealth, vol. 8, no. 9, 2020, p. e18694, https://doi.org/10.2196/18694.
Howell, David R., et al. “Determining the Utility of a Smartphone-Based Gait Evaluation for
Possible Use in Concussion Management.” The Physician and Sportsmedicine, vol. 48, no. 1, June 2019, pp. 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2019.1632155. Accessed 7 July 2021.
Hutabarat, Yonatan, et al. “IEEE Xplore Full-Text PDF”: Ieee.org, 2025,
ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9568979. Accessed 7 Sept. 2025.
Mason, Rachel, et al. “Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.” Sports
Medicine, vol. 53, no. 1, Oct. 2022, pp. 241–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01760-6.
Mazurek, Kevin A., et al. “A Validation Study Demonstrating Portable Motion Capture Cameras
Accurately Characterize Gait Metrics When Compared to a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway.” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, p. 17464, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68402-x.
Muro-de-la-Herran, Alvaro, et al. “Gait Analysis Methods: An Overview of Wearable and
Non-Wearable Systems, Highlighting Clinical Applications.” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 3362–94, https://doi.org/10.3390/s140203362.
Park, Heesu, et al. “Classification of Gait Phases Based on a Machine Learning Approach Using
Muscle Synergy.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, Frontiers Media, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201935.
Pirker, Walter, and Regina Katzenschlager. “Gait disorders in adults and the elderly : A clinical
guide.” Wiener klinische Wochenschrift vol. 129,3-4 (2017): 81-95. doi:10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4
Schapira, Anthony H. V., et al. “Glucocerebrosidase in Parkinson’s Disease: Insights into
Pathogenesis and Prospects for Treatment.” Movement Disorders, vol. 31, no. 6, Apr. 2016, pp. 830–35, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26616. Accessed 23 Jan. 2020.
Wang, Xiaoming, et al. “Wearable Sensors for Activity Monitoring and Motion Control: A
Review.” Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1, Feb. 2023, p. 100089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.birob.2023.100089.
World Health Organization. “World Report on Disability.” Www.who.int, 2011, www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Research Archive of Rising Scholars

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.