The Influence of Exposing the Illusion of Explanatory Depth on Communication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3996Keywords:
Illusion of Explanatory Depth (IOED), Cognitive Bias, Intellectual Humanity, Political Polarization, Communication, Cognitive MisersAbstract
The Illusion of Explanatory Depth (IOED) is a type of cognitive bias that causes humans to
overestimate their understanding of mechanisms. When individuals believe they understand a
subject well, their confidence spikes without realizing their true shallow knowledge. Research
proves that the IOED is why extreme polarization in politics happens. Proving a point thrives on
the confidence of the individual; therefore, it is crucial to ask the right questions in the
discussion. Humans, being cognitive misers, tend to look for shortcuts to store information in
their brain, surviving around a concept called the community of knowledge. Arguments are
usually combat-based, where each side of the party will do anything to get their point across.
However, exposing the Illusion of Explanatory Depth can cause arguments to shift to a more
cooperative discussion. When individuals are asked to explain the underlying mechanics of
whatever they are supporting, it leaves them in conflict where they realize they have been acting
on their own arrogance, rather than true information. The exposition ultimately raises intellectual
humility and causes both parties to lower their defenses, leading to a productive discussion.
While this exposition does not act universally, it is significant to humble disagreements with the
IOED to improve personal communication.
References
Allspaw, J. (2020, January 8). “Tricks of the Trade” on ‘how?’ versus
‘why?’ https://www.adaptivecapacitylabs.com/2020/01/08/tricks-of-the-trade-on-how-versu
s-why/
Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., & Zemla, J. C. (2010). Missing the trees for the forest: A
construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 99(3), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020218
Chesterfield, A., & Coombs, K. (2019, November 25). To fight polarization, ask, “How does
that policy work?” Behavioral Scientist.
https://behavioralscientist.org/to-fight-polarization-ask-how-does-that-policy-work/
Cognitive dissonance | Psychology | Research Starters | EBSCO Research . (n.d.). EBSCO.
https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/cognitive-dissonance
Cojuharenco, I., & Karelaia, N. (2019a). When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums
buffer the effects of competence penalties? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 156, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.12.001
Deng, Z., Deng, Z., Deng, Z., & Deng, Z. (2025). Becoming a cognitive miser? Antecedents
and consequences of addictive ChatGPT use. Social Science & Medicine , 383 , 118467.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118467
Fernbach, P. M., Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Political extremism is
supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science, 24(6), 939–946.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464058
Gollini, S. (2021, May 31). Backfire effect: why debunking does not regenerate our thinking.
Nexus.
https://nexusconsultation.com/en/2021/05/31/backfire-effect-why-debunking-does-not-reg
enerate-our-thinking/
Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of Identity-Protective
Cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067
Körner, R., Schütz, A., & Petersen, L. (2024). “It doesn’t matter if you are in charge of the
trees, you always miss the trees for the forest”: Power and the illusion of explanatory
depth. PLoS ONE, 19(4), e0297850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297850
Mehta, S., & Mehta, N. (2024). Embracing the illusion of explanatory depth: A strategic
framework for using iterative prompting for integrating large language models in
healthcare education. Medical Teacher, 47(2), 208–211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2024.2382863
Meyers, E. A., Gretton, J. D., Budge, J. R. C., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2023).
Broad effects of shallow understanding: Explaining an unrelated phenomenon exposes
the illusion of explanatory depth. Judgment and Decision Making, 18.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.24
Mills, C. M., & Keil, F. C. (2003). Knowing the limits of one’s understanding: The
development of an awareness of an illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology, 87(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.09.003
Nador, J., Harel, A., Juvina, I., & Minnery, B. (2020). The Case of the Cognitive
F(Opti)miser: Electrophysiological Correlates of Working Memory Maintenance Predict
Demand Avoidance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(8), 1550–1561.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01566
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I.
(2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology,
(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of
explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521–562.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
Voelkel, J. G., Brandt, M. J., & Colombo, M. (2018). I know that I know nothing: Can
puncturing the illusion of explanatory depth overcome the relationship between attitudinal
dissimilarity and prejudice? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(1), 56–78.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2018.1464881
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2018). The elusive backfire effect: mass attitudes’ steadfast factual
adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Research Archive of Rising Scholars
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
