Preprint / Version 1

No Perfect Wing

A Comparative Study of Wing Planform Geometry and Its Effect on Aerodynamic Performance

##article.authors##

  • Joel Anto Narayana PU College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.4002

Keywords:

wing planform geometry, aerodynamic performance, XFLR5 simulation, vortex lattice method, comparative wing analysis, future wing designs

Abstract

The shape of an aircraft wing is perhaps the single most important consideration in the field of aerospace design, as it controls the lift, drag and aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft during different phases of flight.  This paper compares six main types of wing planforms: straight, swept, delta, forward-swept, variable geometry, and blended wing body. The research paper further discusses how the shape of the wing influences the lift, drag, and lift-to-drag ratio of an aircraft when traveling at subsonic speed, transonic speed, and supersonic speed. The study makes use of well-established theories, published research studies, and original simulation data generated with XFLR5 v6.62, using the Vortex Lattice Method (VLM2), to examine lift, drag, and lift-to-drag ratio of the three principal planform configurations by changing their angles of attack. Results confirm the swept wing achieved a peak CL/CD of 121.9 compared to 99.6 for the straight wing and 67.8 for the delta wing. The paper ultimately shows that no single shape will be the best choice in all aspects; rather, the different planform shapes are compromises between the performance, speed regime, structural suitability, and the mission requirements which each design was made for. In future, it is expected that morphing wing systems, biomimetic design strategies, and AI-driven geometries will become viable ways to develop planform geometries that can operate beyond the conventional limitations without sacrificing aerodynamic efficiency, which will open up a whole new era in wing design. 

References

NASA Glenn Research Center — Four Forces of Flight

https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/four_forces_of_flight.pdf

NASA Glenn Research Center — Lift to Drag Ratio

https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/lift-to-drag-ratio/

NASA Glenn Research Center — Lift Coefficient

https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/the-lift-coefficient/

NASA Glenn Research Center — Drag Coefficient

https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/the-drag-coefficient/

SKYbrary — Angle of Attack

https://www.skybrary.aero/articles/angle-attack

ScienceDirect — Delta Wing Aircraft Overview

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/delta-wing-aircraft

IJERT — Comparative Study of Delta Wings

https://www.ijert.org/comparative-study-of-structural-analysis-on-delta-wings-with-and-without-sweep-angles

ResearchGate — Straight Wing vs Forward Swept Wing in Transonic Regime

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283447481_A_straight_wing_and_a_forward_swept_wing_compared_with_a_curved_planform_wing_in_the_transonic_regime

NASA Technical Reports — Quest for Performance: Evolution of Modern Aircraft

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19850023776

XFLR5 Official Website — Technical Documentation

http://www.xflr5.tech/xflr5.htm

NASA NTRS — NACA 2412 Airfoil Experimental Study

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19950002355

NASA Armstrong — ACTE Flight Experiment

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/research/ACTE

ResearchGate — Morphing Aircraft Review (Barbarino et al.)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230955425_A_Review_of_Morphing_Aircraft

AIAA — Blended Wing Body Design (Liebeck 2004)

https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9084

AIAA SciTech — FlexFoil ACTE Flight Testing

https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0036

Downloads

Posted

2026-08-02

Categories