Preprint / Version 1

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Detection with Machine Learning Models

##article.authors##

  • Jishnu Guthikonda Eastlake High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.4010

Keywords:

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Autoimmune diseases, Machine Learning

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by immune dysregulation and multisystem inflammation, making diagnosis challenging because of its diverse clinical manifestations and overlap with other autoimmune disorders. Delayed diagnosis can lead to irreversible organ damage, highlighting the need for tools that improve diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the use of a supervised machine learning model to distinguish SLE from other autoimmune diseases using routinely collected clinical and laboratory data. A publicly available synthetic dataset containing over 10,000 patients with autoimmune diseases was used to train and evaluate the model. Features were selected based on the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria and included demographic characteristics, laboratory biomarkers, and clinical symptoms. Model performance was assessed using a 70:30 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, F1 score, and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). The train-test split model achieved an accuracy of 99.73%, precision of 88.59%, recall of 85.15%, specificity of 99.90%, and an F1 score of 85.35%. The 10-fold cross-validation model demonstrated comparable performance, with an average accuracy of 99.74%, precision of 83.40%, recall of 91.53%, specificity of 99.83%, and an F1 score of 86.25%. The model also achieved an AUPRC of 0.9166, indicating strong discrimination despite the highly imbalanced dataset. These findings suggest that machine learning models trained on clinically relevant laboratory and symptom data can accurately identify SLE and may serve as valuable clinical decision-support tools. Additional validation using independent real-world patient datasets is required before clinical implementation.

References

Bertsias, G., & Mavragani, C. P. (2025). Systemic lupus erythematosus. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535405/

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). (n.d.). Systemic lupus erythematosus (MIM No. 152700). Johns Hopkins University. https://www.omim.org/entry/152700

Song, Y., & Kono, M. (2025). Potential biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. JMA Journal, 8(3), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2025-0190

Cojocaru, M., Cojocaru, I. M., Silosi, I., & Vrabie, C. D. (2011). Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Maedica, 6(4), 330–336. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3351863/

Fanouriakis, A., Tziolos, N., Bertsias, G., & Boumpas, D. T. (2022). Systemic lupus erythematosus: Classification, diagnosis, and clinical management. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(17), 5063. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175063

Wang, Z., et al. (2025). Validity and applicability of machine learning models for systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis. Lupus Science & Medicine, 13(1), e002007. https://lupus.bmj.com/content/13/1/e002007

Zhou, Y., Wang, M., Zhao, S., & Yan, Y. (2022). Machine learning for diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 7167066. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7167066 (Retracted in 2023.)

Park, M. (2024). Improving the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with machine learning algorithms based on real-world data. Mathematics, 12(18), 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182849

Bortoluzzi, A., et al. (2024). A machine learning model for systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis based on routine laboratory tests. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. https://www.clinexprheumatol.org/article.asp?a=19813

Downloads

Posted

2026-08-02

Categories