The Welfare State in Practice: A Dual Lens Study on Economic Outcomes and Social Mobility from Government Upliftment Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2868Keywords:
Government Upliftment Programs, Welfare State in Practice, Social MobilityAbstract
The welfare state remains one of the most debated constructs in modern political economy, embodying both a safety net for vulnerable populations and a mechanism for fostering economic equity. This paper examines welfare states through a dual lens—evaluating their influence on economic outcomes and social mobility via government upliftment programs. Drawing on examples from universalist welfare systems (e.g., Sweden and Norway), hybrid models (e.g., the United States), and emerging welfare initiatives (e.g., India’s MGNREGA and Brazil’s Bolsa Família), the study assesses how redistributive policies impact GDP growth, income inequality, and intergenerational opportunity. It investigates core welfare mechanisms—such as cash transfers, education subsidies, healthcare guarantees, and employment schemes—and analyzes their long-term effects on citizens’ capacity to move up the socio-economic ladder. While findings suggest that robust welfare systems tend to foster stronger social cohesion and mobility, they also reveal trade-offs: fiscal burdens, dependency risks, and uneven implementation can undermine efficiency and public trust. Ultimately, this paper argues that welfare should not be viewed as a static model but as a dynamic policy toolkit—one that, when well-designed and adaptive, can balance economic growth with human development and create pathways for sustainable, inclusive prosperity.
References
Baldwin, P. (1990). The politics of social solidarity: Class bases of the European welfare state, 1875–1975. Cambridge University Press.
Barr, N. (2012). Economics of the welfare state (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju022
Collins, S. R., Bhupal, H. K., & Doty, M. M. (2020). Health insurance coverage eight years after the ACA: Fewer uninsured Americans and shorter coverage gaps, but more underinsured. The Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved from https://www.commonwealthfund.org
Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M., & van de Walle, D. (2012). Does India’s employment guarantee scheme guarantee employment? Policy Research Working Paper Series 6003. World Bank.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Polity Press.
Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Dirven, H. J. (1999). The real worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge University Press.
Heckman, J. J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–47.
Heckman, J. J., & Mosso, S. (2014). The economics of human development and social mobility. Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 689–733. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-040753
Khera, R. (2016). The revival of the employment guarantee scheme in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(9), 61–70.
Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657333
Lindert, K. (2014). Brazil’s Bolsa Família program: A decade of social inclusion. World Bank.
Martin, J. P., & Immervoll, H. (2007). The employment effects of social protection schemes in OECD countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 35.
OECD. (2010). Employment outlook: Moving beyond the jobs crisis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2022). Social expenditure database (SOCX). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.
Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2010.0017
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. W.W. Norton.
Tanner, M. (2015). The inclusive economy: How to bring wealth to America’s poor. Cato Institute.
World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aarnav Agrawal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.